Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that An accurate self-ascription must track the state that genuinely explains behavior, not merely a consciously endorsed surrogate that coexists with a divergent unconscious determinant.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Conscious endorsements ARE constitutive of selfhood; what we genuinely believe about ourselves partially defines who we are.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Determining the 'genuine' causal explanation requires arbitrary metaphysical assumptions about which causal level counts as fundamental.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Practical self-ascription for social coordination often requires endorsement-based self-description, making accuracy-tracking too demanding.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Psychoanalytic evidence shows unconscious drives often cause behavior contrary to conscious self-reports, demonstrating explanatory divergence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Self-knowledge requires identifying actual causal mechanisms, not merely introspectively accessible beliefs about our motivations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Moral and epistemic accountability demands accurate self-ascription tied to real determinants, not comforting false narratives.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.