Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that An act necessitated by a prior determining condition—even a 'ground of being'—fails the sourcehood condition required by libertarian freedom.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
A ground of being can constitute the agent's own nature; necessitation by one's essence doesn't negate sourcehood.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Sourcehood may require only that the agent's reasons/character caused the act, not exemption from all determination.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates 'determined by prior conditions' with 'determined by external prior conditions'—not identical.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Sourcehood requires the agent, not prior conditions, to be the ultimate originator of action.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If prior conditions necessitate an act, the agent cannot have been otherwise—a core libertarian requirement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even divine grounds of being function as external determining forces that preclude agent originatorship.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.