Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that An action that admits of no alternative possibilities cannot be free in the morally relevant sense, even if performed without external compulsion.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Freedom relevant to morality might require only acting from one's own desires and reasoning, not metaphysical alternative possibilities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If determinism is true, the 'alternatives' condition is impossible for anyone; yet we reasonably hold people morally responsible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
An agent who acts from stable character and reasoning demonstrates moral agency regardless of whether physics allowed different outcomes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Moral responsibility requires the agent could have done otherwise; without alternatives, responsibility becomes meaningless punishment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Determinism eliminates genuine alternatives; an action following necessarily from prior states wasn't truly chosen among options.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Desert-based justifications for punishment presuppose the agent possessed real choice; necessity undercuts this justification entirely.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.