Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that An action that undermines rational self-governance cannot be unconditionally good, even if it produces momentary subjective relief.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Some situations require abandoning rational deliberation—grief, emergency response, or radical acceptance—where such surrender produces genuine good.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Valuing rational self-governance above all other goods assumes a controversial metaphysical priority that many ethical frameworks reject.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Momentary subjective relief itself constitutes a real good; denying this privileges abstract rationality over concrete human experience and wellbeing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Rational self-governance is constitutive of human dignity and autonomy, making its undermining incompatible with genuine human flourishing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Actions eroding decision-making capacity create dependency patterns that compound harm over time, outweighing temporary subjective benefits.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Goodness grounded only in momentary relief ignores consequences and treats persons as mere receptacles for sensation rather than agents.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.