Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An additively separable social welfare function evaluates... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Egalitarian values cannot be correctly represented by an additively separable social welfare function.

    An additively separable social welfare function evaluates each individual's well-being independently, without reference to relative positions.

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment3 linked

    Related

    A framework that excludes relational comparisons cannot capture values that are ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Egalitarian values cannot be correctly represented by an additively separable so...
    Egalitarianism is defined by its reliance on judgments of relative positions bet...

    Similar

    A separable social welfare function reflects the idea that each person...90%Egalitarian values cannot be correctly represented by an additively se...83%It is possible to construct a Bergson-Samuelson social welfare functio...79%The Bergson-Samuelson social welfare function can be constructed consi...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: economic-justice
    View source passageHide passage
    Philosophical interest in the measurement of inequality has recently risen (Temkin 1993). Most of this philosophical literature, however, tends to focus on defining the right foundations for an aversion to inequality. In particular, Parfit (1995) proposes to give priority to the worse-off not because of their relative position compared to the better-off, but because and to the extent that they are badly off. This probably corresponds to defining social welfare by an additively separable social w

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective