Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that An agent who complies with an unjust command bears moral responsibility for the resulting injustice, not merely the state.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Severe power asymmetries (threats to life/livelihood) can override meaningful choice, making 'compliance' partially coerced action.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The state structures commands, enforcement mechanisms, and institutional pressures; agents operate within systems they didn't design.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Holding only individual agents responsible obscures systemic injustice and allows institutions to evade their primary moral culpability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Moral agents retain practical reasoning capacity even under authority; they can deliberate whether commands align with justice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Distributing responsibility only to the state eliminates accountability for those who execute injustice, eroding personal moral agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Compliance requires an affirmative choice; passive obedience doesn't eliminate the agent's causal role in the resulting harm.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.