Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An agent whose action is never the one most supported by ... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→In a no-best-world scenario, if world-value exhausts God's reasons for acting, God never does what God has most reason to do, and thus God's action is never supremely morally good.

    An agent whose action is never the one most supported by reasons does not act in a supremely morally good way.

    Divine AttributesVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    2 topics

    Against a future action of God3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modality & Possibility
    2 linked

    Related

    A world is a maximal state of affairs that includes everything morally relevant.From a deliberative perspective, God must have more reason to realize a world wi...In a no-best-world scenario, if world-value exhausts God's reasons for acting, G...In a no-best-world scenario, there is always a better world God could have actua...

    Similar

    Being less than fully virtuous gives agents reasons to act that they o...81%Those reasons would not motivate a fully virtuous agent.81%In a no-best-world scenario, if world-value exhausts God's reasons for...79%Permitting such acts means the agent incurs no obligation under possib...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: perfect-goodness
    View source passageHide passage
    If we think that the evaluation of worlds is distinct from the evaluation of actions, then there is room to resist the move from (3) to (4), and this is indeed the standard point at which to resist. One might object that this resistance is bound to come to nothing. A world is a maximal state of affairs; everything that is morally relevant, and thus can give God reason to choose to actualize one world over another, is included in its value. So it of course follows that, from the deliberative pers

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective