Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An agent's assessment of the relative costs of erroneousl... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Selectivity in self-deception can be explained without positing an intention to deceive oneself

    An agent's assessment of the relative costs of erroneously believing p versus ~p determines whether motivation biases belief

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Skepticism2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Consciousness & Mind
    1 linked

    Related

    Empirical research on lay hypothesis testing supports this cost-based accountSelectivity in self-deception can be explained without positing an intention to ...When the subjective cost of falsely believing ~p is high, the agent becomes more...When the subjective cost of falsely believing ~p is low, self-deception toward p...

    Similar

    When the subjective cost of falsely believing ~p is high, the agent be...85%It is possible for a person to acquire a false belief that p through m...80%When the subjective cost of falsely believing ~p is low, self-deceptio...79%Deflationary accounts must explain why strong desire that p produces b...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: self-deception
    View source passageHide passage
    Self-Deception and Selectivity: Another objection raised by intentionalists is that deflationary accounts cannot explain the selective nature of self-deception, termed the ‘selectivity problem’ by Bermúdez (1997, 2000). Why is it, such intentionalists ask, that we are not rendered bias in favor of the belief that p in many cases where we have a very strong desire that p (or anxiety or some other motivation related to p)? Intentionalists argue that an intention to get oneself to acquire the belie

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective