Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that An appeal to libertarian free will is problematic.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Agent-causal accounts (Chisholm, O'Connor) provide coherent frameworks for libertarian free will grounded in substance causation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The absence of consensus on a concept does not establish that the concept is incoherent or philosophically unusable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Theists need only show libertarian free will is possible, not that a complete theory has been settled, for the defense to succeed.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Alvin Plantinga's Free Will Defense requires only the logical possibility of libertarian freedom, not a fully developed metaphysical account.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Demanding a complete theory before invoking a concept would invalidate most philosophical arguments, including compatibilist ones used against the defense.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
No satisfactory account of the concept of libertarian free will is yet available.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.