Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that An argument may aim to promote reflection and raise important questions rather than to resolve disagreement.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Arguments are structurally defined by their function of providing reasons that justify or refute conclusions (Toulmin, 'The Uses of Argument').
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Promoting reflection without truth-directed resolution is better classified as rhetoric or inquiry, not argumentation proper.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Conflating argument with open-ended inquiry dissolves the conceptual boundary that makes argument a distinct epistemic practice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Pragma-dialectical theory (van Eemeren & Grootendorst) grounds argumentative norms in the goal of resolving differences of opinion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If argumentation is severed from resolution-seeking, it loses the normative standards by which moves can be judged valid or fallacious.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Not all arguments aim to resolve disagreement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Some arguments are presented with the purpose of promoting reflection and raising important questions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.