An argument that never posits definite pre-measurement values for observables cannot be said to assume noncontextuality, since noncontextuality is a constraint on such pre-existing values.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Observable(in quantum mechanics and physics): A property or measurement of something that can actually be detected or measured, like the position or spin of a particle.
Pre-measurement values(as used in quantum physics philosophy): The idea that particles have definite properties (like a specific location or speed) *before* we measure them, rather than only having definite properties once we look at them.
argument(Epistemology and argumentation theory; the 'evidentiary' conception of argument): An evidentiary construct consisting of (1) premises, (2) a conclusion, and (3) an inference from the premises to the conclusion, implying that the conclusion is true, likely true, plausible, or should otherwise be accepted.
constraint(canonical formulations of general relativity and electromagnetism): A condition encoding the fact that canonical variables cannot be specified independently of one another.

Based on where you are in your exploration