Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    An Aristotelian treats the stone as falling under constra... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Galileo and an Aristotelian observer would not have collected the same data from pendulum experiments

    An Aristotelian treats the stone as falling under constraint toward the center of the earth, making those Galilean quantities of no interest

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Galileo and an Aristotelian observer would not have collected the same data from...Galileo treated pendulum swings as constrained circular motions, making radius, ...Observers collect data on quantities that are salient given their theoretical fr...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The Transitivity of Parthood is treated as a non-negotiable constraint...67%The use of pebbles to represent numbers and references to odd and even...67%Natural philosophy would otherwise be incomplete without a treatment o...67%If Carnap's position is interpreted deflationistically, it loses all p...66%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: science-theory-observation
    View source passageHide passage
    and ignore radius, angular displacement, and time per swing (ibid., 124). These last were salient to Galileo because he treated pendulum swings as constrained circular motions. The Galilean quantities would be of no interest to an Aristotelian who treats the stone as falling under constraint toward the center of the earth (ibid., 123). Thus Galileo and the Aristotelian would not have collected the same data. (Absent records of Aristotelian pendulum experiments we can think of this as a thought e

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective