Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    An asymmetric epistemic standard that penalizes one type ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Anthropodenial is just as worrisome as anthropomorphism

    An asymmetric epistemic standard that penalizes one type of error while ignoring the equally serious opposite error is methodologically unsound

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility
    1 linked

    Related

    Anthropodenial is just as worrisome as anthropomorphismAnthropodenial is the a priori rejection of the possibility that humans and anim...There is an imbalance in comparative cognition such that over-attribution of men...

    Similar

    Logical faults are also epistemic faults.75%Acknowledging variation in certain epistemic norms does not entail aba...75%Extremely demanding epistemic norms are sometimes inappropriate even i...75%McCloskey's philosophical position that epistemological standards shou...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: cognition-animal
    View source passageHide passage
    However, the dictum regarding the need to avoid anthropomorphism is also a philosophical assumption embedded in comparative cognition and, as such, it can be questioned. It has been argued, for instance, that a blanket ban against the attribution of human-like qualities to animals would beg the question by assuming that said qualities are indeed uniquely human (Fitzpatrick 2017a). Frans de Waal (1999) uses the term “anthropodenial” to refer to the a priori rejection of the possibility that human

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective