Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    An empirical assumption is wrong if its predictions are c... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Newton's assumption that resistance forces can be represented as a sum with one term giving the contribution made purely by the inertia of the fluid was empirically wrong.

    An empirical assumption is wrong if its predictions are contradicted by theoretical analysis and observation.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    D'Alembert showed that the net inertial force on a body in a perfect fluid is ex...Newton's assumption that resistance forces can be represented as a sum with one ...Resistance forces always arise from a combination of viscous and inertial effect...

    Similar

    Our beliefs about empirical matters can be mistaken in any given case,...82%A claim that a theory is in error in its claim to universality is an e...79%Arguments that involve empirical assumptions cannot be purely a priori79%Because the assumption is held as a regulative ideal rather than as fa...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: newton-principia
    View source passageHide passage
    In fact, there is a deep mistake in Newton's approach to resistance forces that came to be understood only at the beginning of the twentieth century. Resistance forces do not arise from independent contributions made by such factors as the viscosity and inertia of the fluid. Consequently, no polynomial consisting of a few always positive terms in powers of velocity can ever be adequate for resistance forces. The first indication of this came when d'Alembert, unhappy with Newton's ad hoc theory f

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective