Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An employer may have sound statistical evidence that wome... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Using statistically sound group-level absenteeism data to exclude women and blacks from hiring is unlawful under disparate treatment doctrine.

    An employer may have sound statistical evidence that women and blacks are more prone to absenteeism due to caretaking responsibilities and unreliable public transportation respectively.

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty

    Key Terms

    Absenteeism(as used in employment discussions)
    The pattern of frequently being absent or missing from work, school, or other regular commitments.
    Caretaking responsibilities(as used in gender and employment ethics)
    Duties involved in looking after dependents like children, elderly parents, or sick family members, which can take up time and attention.
    Statistical evidence

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (as used in epistemology and philosophy of science)
    Information gathered from data and numbers that helps us figure out whether something is probably true or false.
    discrimination(Raised as a condition potentially necessary for self-knowledge)
    The ability of a subject to distinguish a priori between two concepts (e.g., the water concept and the Dry Earthian concept)

    Related

    Acting on such group-level statistical evidence to restrict hiring to white and ...Disparate treatment of protected groups in hiring decisions is forbidden by U.S....Using statistically sound group-level absenteeism data to exclude women and blac...

    Similar

    An employer using group-level statistical evidence (e.g., that women o...83%Using statistically sound group-level absenteeism data to exclude wome...76%Acting on such group-level statistical evidence to restrict hiring to ...69%Using race as a criterion is wrong even when customer racial preferenc...68%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: equal-opportunity
    View source passageHide passage
    The disparate treatment of U.S. employment law forbids statistical discrimination against members of protected groups. For example, an employer might consider being prone to absenteeism a decisive disqualification for a particular job, and have sound statistical evidence that women (who might have caretaking responsibilities that prevent them from coming to work) and blacks (who must rely on unreliable public transportation to arrive at the work site) are more likely than white and Hispanic male

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective