Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that An idea that requires experiential triggers to be summoned, as Descartes concedes with sensory occasions, exhibits contingent rather than innate origin.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Activation-requirement and origin-claim are distinct: a dormant innate structure may require triggers to become conscious without ceasing to be innate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Sensory occasions might occasion ideas without causing them—triggering pre-existing rational capacities differs from generating ideas from sensory content.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even empiricists grant that some structured cognitive principles organize experience; innateness may describe these principles, not their conscious deployment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If ideas require external triggers to activate, their existence depends on contingent world-states, not necessary cognitive structures.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Descartes' own admission that sensory occasions prompt ideas undermines his claim that these ideas are innate, not derived from experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Truly innate ideas should be accessible without environmental conditions; dependence on experiential triggers indicates empirical origin.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42