Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An infinite regress of forms is generated by the argument... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Connected to 2 discussions

    Challenges→The infinite regress of forms threatens the principle of Uniqueness.
    Challenges→The infinite regress of forms, combined with Purity-F, threatens the principle of Oneness.

    An infinite regress of forms is generated by the argument that every form is a thought of a form.

    Consciousness & MindModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge5 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Purity-F holds: forms are pure, not mixed with their participants.The infinite regress of forms threatens the principle of Uniqueness.The infinite regress of forms, combined with Purity-F, threatens the principle o...The reasoning parallels the Third Man argument's conflict with Oneness.
    +1 moreShow less
    Uniqueness requires that there be only one form for any given set of instances.

    Similar

    An infinite regress of forms follows from the assumption that every fo...92%The infinite regress of forms threatens the principle of Uniqueness.87%The infinite regress of forms, combined with Purity-F, threatens the p...86%The regress leads to the claim that each form in the infinite hierarch...84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: plato-parmenides
    View source passageHide passage
    Parmenides’ first argument appears to have the following structure. First, all thoughts have intentional objects: every thought is of something rather than nothing. Second, the object of any thought T is something that T thinks to be one over all the instances. But anything that is thought to be one over all the instances is a form. Parmenides concludes that the intentional object of every thought is a form, and hence if every form is a thought then every form is a thought of a form. Although Pa

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective