Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An infinitely constructed disjunction listing E's true-wo... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Moral statement E entails disjunction D

    An infinitely constructed disjunction listing E's true-worlds may be logically well-formed yet fail to capture the modal ground of E's necessity.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Logical well-formedness concerns syntax and consistency; grounding concerns metaphysical explanation of why necessity obtains.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.An infinite disjunction of worlds may be grammatically complete yet leave unexplained why those worlds—and no others—are necessary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Modal grounding requires identifying the source or foundation of necessity, which enumeration alone cannot provide.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If a complete disjunction of E's true-worlds exhaustively specifies all necessary truths about E, no further grounding remains needed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Grounding claims that appeal to something beyond the facts themselves face the regress problem: what grounds the ground?
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Modal necessity may simply consist in invariance across possible worlds; enumeration fully captures this without additional metaphysical substrate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    An infinite disjunction of worlds may be grammatically complete yet leave unexpl...Grounding claims that appeal to something beyond the facts themselves face the r...If a complete disjunction of E's true-worlds exhaustively specifies all necessar...Logical well-formedness concerns syntax and consistency; grounding concerns meta...
    +3 moreShow less
    Modal grounding requires identifying the source or foundation of necessity, whic...Modal necessity may simply consist in invariance across possible worlds; enumera...Moral statement E entails disjunction D

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit