An institutional finding of liability aims at systemic accuracy across a class of cases, not truth in a single possible-world scenario, so Judith Jarvis Thomson's market-share liability intuitions support aggregate probabilistic justice.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Aggregate probabilistic justice(ethics and justice): A fair system that looks at overall odds and patterns—like holding a group of companies responsible based on the likelihood they caused harm—rather than requiring proof in each individual case.
Institutional finding of liability(law and justice): A legal or official decision that an organization or system is responsible for harm, based on patterns across many cases rather than proving what happened in one specific situation.
Judith Jarvis Thomson(philosophy history): A famous American philosopher who wrote influential work on ethics, rights, and legal responsibility, including ideas about how companies should be held accountable when many of them might share blame.
Market-share liability(law and ethics): A legal concept where companies are held responsible for harm based on their share of the market, even when you can't prove exactly which company caused a specific person's injury.

Based on where you are in your exploration