An obligation derived solely from the capacity to prevent harm with minimal cost implicitly endorses the impartial aggregative reasoning Williams identifies as integrity-destroying.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Treating everyone fairly without favoring some people over others; not biased toward particular individuals or groups.
obligation(Within obligational disputation)
The respondent's commitment to a specific stance on the case put forward by the opponent, which governs how the respondent must respond to subsequent propositions throughout the disputation.