Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that An obligation that predictably produces worse outcomes than an available alternative violates the core deontic function of directing agents toward the good.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Duties may bind agents regardless of outcomes—keeping promises matters even when breaking them helps more.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Predictability is uncertain; agents cannot always know which alternative truly produces better results long-term.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Some obligations protect rights or dignity that supersede consequentialist calculations about aggregate good.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Deontic systems exist to guide action; prescribing worse outcomes undermines their fundamental rational purpose.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Agents cannot be morally required to do what reliably prevents the good they're obligated to promote.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Obligation without regard to consequences becomes arbitrary, detached from the welfare it should serve.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.