Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An offender's desert provides a reason in favour of punis... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Positive retributivism holds that desert provides an in-principle sufficient reason for punishment, though only in principle.

    An offender's desert provides a reason in favour of punishment: the state should punish those found guilty to the extent that they deserve, because they deserve it.

    Justice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & Punishment

    Related

    Positive retributivism holds that desert provides an in-principle sufficient rea...There are good reasons — to do with the costs, both material and moral, of punis...

    Similar

    If desert provides a limit to punishment, then punishment must be dese...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    88%
    Positive retributivism holds that desert provides an in-principle suff...86%
    Wrongdoing is merely a necessary condition for punishment, not a suffi...86%
    Punishment of wrongdoers is justified by the moral desert of the offen...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: legal-punishment
    View source passageHide passage
    Theorists have distinguished ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ forms of retributivism. Positive retributivism holds that an offender’s desert provides a reason in favour of punishment; essentially, the state should punish those found guilty of criminal offences to the extent that they deserve, because they deserve it. Penal desert constitutes not just a necessary, but an in-principle sufficient reason for punishment (only in principle, however, since there are good reasons — to do with the costs, both material and moral, of punishment — why we should not even try to punish all the guilty). Negative re...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective