Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that An omnipotent God could exist in an infinite past time that is unbounded, thereby preceding all finite temporal intervals.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Infinite temporal regress violates the causal principle that every contingent fact requires explanation in prior causes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An omnipotent being independent of time cannot simultaneously exist 'in' an infinite past without contradicting atemporality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Unbounded past time makes the present moment impossible to reach, creating a paradox for any actual temporal existence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Omnipotence entails no logical limits on a being's capacities, including temporal existence across infinite durations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An infinite past is logically coherent: each moment has a prior moment without requiring a first moment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A timeless or eternally existing God can coherently precede all finite intervals without being temporally located within them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.