Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    An ordinal that contains all ordinals would have to be la... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There is no ordinal for the order type of the set of all ordinals.

    An ordinal that contains all ordinals would have to be larger than itself.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    If there were an ordinal corresponding to the order type of the set of all ordin...No ordinal can be larger than itself — this is a contradiction.There is no ordinal for the order type of the set of all ordinals.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    No ordinal can be larger than itself — this is a contradiction.89%Any collection containing copies of all the ordinals is too large to b...83%If there were an ordinal corresponding to the order type of the set of...82%Because the von Neumann ordinals form a proper class, the universe mus...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: infinity
    View source passageHide passage
    Because we have this one-to-one correspondence between the cardinals and the ordinals, one might be tempted to say that the set of cardinals and the set of ordinals have the same order type, and then ask what the ordinal of this order type (and its cardinality) is. However, if there were such an ordinal, there would be a paradox—it would have to contain, and thus be larger than, all ordinals, including itself! This is the Burali-Forti paradox (see entry paradoxes and contemporary logic).

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective