Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Analysing the self requires examining the parts that constitute a person
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Descartes' cogito establishes that the self is known immediately through thinking, prior to any analysis of bodily or mental parts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If self-knowledge is foundationally pre-analytical, then part-analysis cannot be constitutive of, but only derivative from, the self.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Kant argues the transcendental unity of apperception ('I think') is a formal condition that unifies representations, not itself a composite of parts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A unifying condition cannot be explained by what it is the condition of, making aggregate-analysis of the self categorically circular.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The conception of self is embedded in personhood
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Personhood is constituted by the five aggregates
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The assumption of self arises in relation to personhood
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.