Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Annotations are therefore typically restricted to the sen... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Broad-coverage statistical word sense disambiguation tools remain elusive

    Annotations are therefore typically restricted to the senses of a few polysemous words

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    Broad-coverage statistical word sense disambiguation tools remain elusiveConstructing a sense-annotated training corpus with sufficiently many occurrence...Thousands of words have multiple senses in sources such as WordNet

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Thousands of words have multiple senses in sources such as WordNet80%This restriction to a limited set of words is arbitrary given the rich...79%Genuinely distinct lexical senses would be expected to be independentl...76%If no language is found that uses distinct words for the allegedly dis...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-linguistics
    View source passageHide passage
    Classification of selected words or phrases in sentential or broader contexts: As noted earlier, examples include WSD, named entity recognition, and sentence boundary detection. The only point of distinction from text/document classification is that it is not a chunk of text as a whole, but rather a word or phrase in the context of such a chunk that is to be classified. Therefore features are chosen to reflect both the features of the target word or phrase (such as morphology) and the way it rel

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective