Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Anomalous monism shows that mental causation is efficacio... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The plausibility of interactionism is an empirical matter

    Anomalous monism shows that mental causation is efficacious only under physical descriptions, not mentalistic ones.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Physical closure: every physical event has a sufficient physical cause, leaving no causal gaps for non-physical mental properties to fill.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Mental properties supervene on physical properties, so mental causation must operate through the physical properties that realize mental states.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Descriptions are explanatory tools; mentalistic descriptions successfully explain behavior only by tracking underlying physical causal mechanisms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Mental causation via physical description alone seems to deny genuine mental causation—if only physics causes effects, mentality becomes epiphenomenal.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Explanatory efficacy matters: mental descriptions often provide causal understanding unavailable from physical descriptions alone (e.g., beliefs cause behavior).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim conflates 'what realizes causation' with 'what does the causing'—oxygen realizes fire's burning, but fire, not oxygen, explains the causation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedConsciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    Descriptions are explanatory tools; mentalistic descriptions successfully explai...Explanatory efficacy matters: mental descriptions often provide causal understan...Mental causation via physical description alone seems to deny genuine mental cau...Mental properties supervene on physical properties, so mental causation must ope...
    +3 moreShow less
    Physical closure: every physical event has a sufficient physical cause, leaving ...The claim conflates 'what realizes causation' with 'what does the causing'—oxyge...The plausibility of interactionism is an empirical matter

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit