Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Anselm's Cur Deus Homo defines honor as the fitting order of rational creatures rendering God His due obedience and worship.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Defining honor as obedience risks making morality servile rather than noble, reducing rational creatures to instruments of divine will.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The equation of 'fitting order' with 'obedience' assumes hierarchical subordination is the only rational relationship between God and creatures.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This framework struggles to account for honor concepts in secular ethics that don't presuppose theological hierarchy or divine obedience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Honor inherently involves proper hierarchical ordering: creatures acknowledging their dependent status relative to God reflects metaphysical reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Anselm's framework explains why sin is fundamentally dishonoring—it disrupts the rational creature's proper orientation toward its source and end.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This definition unifies moral obligation with cosmic order, making ethics objective rather than merely subjective human preference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.