Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Any agent who has the power to do something must believe himself to have that power.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Agents routinely possess capacities they have never exercised and have no epistemic access to, as Ryle's dispositional analysis of abilities demonstrates.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A disposition can be real and causally efficacious without the possessor having any belief about it, as shown by unconscious competencies in skill acquisition research.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Frankfurt's cases demonstrate that agents can act from powers they mistakenly believe are absent, as when a coerced agent acts freely without recognizing their own uncoerced will.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If an agent can exercise a power while believing they lack it, then belief in the power is neither necessary nor constitutive of its possession.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
Genuine possession of a power is accompanied by the agent's belief that the agent possesses that power.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.