Skip to content

Topics Thinkers Changes ContributorsLoading account…

Carmelics

A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

Navigate

Topics
Search
Recent Changes
Contribute
How It Works
Glossary
Thinkers
Contributors
About
Statistics
Terms
Privacy

Database

Statements: —
Perspectives: —
Topics: —

Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

Made within

DC&

Austin

Statements: 321,452
Perspectives: 108,905
Topics: 42

Any determination rule licensing an analogical inference ... — Carmelics

History Edit See Inverse

Part of a larger discussion

Supports→Recasting analogy as a deductive argument does not solve the problem of justification for analogical reasoning

Any determination rule licensing an analogical inference must privilege certain predicates as projectible, yet this selection itself requires analogical or inductive support.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

Connections

2 topics

Truth & Knowledge1 linked Skepticism1 linked

Related

Recasting analogy as a deductive argument does not solve the problem of justific...

Next step

Based on where you are in your exploration

Explore a random proposition

Start fresh with something unrelated.

Details

Type: claim
Perspectives: 0 (0 for, 0 against)
Edits: 1 edit

Open for perspectives

This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

Share the first perspective