Any Elementary Philosophy that relies on trans-experiential causation to ground objective matter thereby violates the critical constraints it ostensibly accepts, undermining its own coherence.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Critical constraints(rules about the proper boundaries between science and religion/theology): Limits or boundaries that Kant believed philosophy and science must respect to stay legitimate—basically, rules about what kinds of claims are valid and what should be kept separate.
Elementary Philosophy(the type of philosophy being criticized in the statement): A basic or foundational approach to philosophy that tries to explain how knowledge and reality work using simple, primary principles.
Ground (as a verb)(as used in epistemology): To serve as the foundation or justification for a belief—to be the reason why you should accept something as true.
Objective matter(what the philosophy is trying to explain the existence of): Physical things in the world that exist independently of what any person thinks or feels about them—like rocks or tables.

Based on where you are in your exploration