Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Any proof of this form would ultimately rely on the intui... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The syllogism 'if As are Bs and Bs are Cs, then As are Cs' is a perfect deduction in Aristotle's sense

    Any proof of this form would ultimately rely on the intuitive validity of this sort of argument

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility4 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A perfect deduction is one whose validity needs no proofAnything taking the form 'if As are Bs and Bs are Cs, then As are Cs' is a deduc...The syllogism 'if As are Bs and Bs are Cs, then As are Cs' is a perfect deductio...The validity of this syllogistic form needs no proof and admits of no proof

    Similar

    An argument is proved valid if it can be shown to be an instance of a ...79%Every argument of D3 is logically valid.78%Transcendental arguments answer skeptical doubts by claiming that X is...77%In the Third Man argument, the claim that each form is F is derived fr...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aristotle
    View source passageHide passage
    Accordingly, anything taking this form will be a deduction in Aristotle’s sense. Let the As, Bs, and Cs be anything at all, and if indeed the As are Bs, and the Bs Cs, then of necessity the As will be Cs. This particular deduction is perfect because its validity needs no proof, and perhaps because it admits of no proof either: any proof would seem to rely ultimately upon the intuitive validity of this sort of argument.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective