Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Apparent happiness without God reflects a disordered will mistaking finite goods for the infinite good, not genuine flourishing (Confessions I.1).
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Many secular individuals report sustained wellbeing through meaning-making, relationships, and creative pursuits without theistic frameworks.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim conflates 'not ultimate' with 'not genuinely good'—finite goods can provide real flourishing even if they're not infinite or eternal.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Augustine's framework assumes God-directed will is necessary for genuine flourishing, but this remains doctrinally contested even within Christian traditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Finite goods (pleasure, wealth, status) are by nature temporary and exhaustible, leaving inherent dissatisfaction when pursued as ultimate ends.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Only an infinite, immutable good can satisfy the infinite capacity for desire present in human consciousness and rational reflection.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Psychological research shows hedonic adaptation causes satisfaction from material goods to diminish, supporting Augustine's diagnosis of disordered seeking.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.