Applying classical logical forms is not inherently 'smuggling' commitments—it's transparent methodology; the real issue is whether intuitionistic constraints are justified as neutral.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
(Formal logic differing from classical logic in its treatment of structural rules and logical consequence)
A logic that does not accept all classical structural rules, thereby invalidating certain classically valid formulas such as (p → q) ∨ p
logical forms(Kantian epistemology)
The capacities that structure the contents of judgment for Kant, which on the Sellars/McDowell reading also structure sensory experience via application of the categories
methodology(Zabarella's distinction between natural faculties and their use)
The study of the use a human being makes of the natural faculties of the mind, which use can be true or false, better or worse