Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Applying intentional categories to a being prior to and independent of any physical or temporal substrate is categorically incoherent, as Kant argues in the Critique of Pure Reason's Transcendental Dialectic.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Classical theism argues God's eternality doesn't preclude intentionality; divine knowing is simultaneous with all moments, not temporally dependent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant's categories apply to human cognition specifically; their inapplicability to non-empirical beings doesn't prove intentionality is incoherent there.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If abstract objects (numbers, propositions) have intrinsic properties without substrates, intentional properties might similarly transcend physical requirements.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Intentionality presupposes temporal succession: thought requires time to move from subject to object, making pre-temporal intentionality incoherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant shows categories apply only to intuitions structured by space and time; non-spatiotemporal entities fall outside their legitimate scope.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Ascribing intentional states (belief, desire, will) to immaterial beings requires explaining how non-physical substrate instantiates mental content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.