Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Applying the term 'vehicle' in the Road Traffic Act requi... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The legal effect of the Road Traffic Act does not depend merely on physical facts and social facts.

    Applying the term 'vehicle' in the Road Traffic Act requires evaluative reasoning.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    If evaluative reasoning is required to apply a legal term, then the legal effect...The legal effect of the Road Traffic Act does not depend merely on physical fact...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Whether an object counts as a 'vehicle' cannot be determined without e...88%The legal effect of the Road Traffic Act depends on whether an object ...79%Default reasoning (e.g., 'normally a car has a motor') allows tractabl...77%If evaluative reasoning is required to apply a legal term, then the le...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: law-language
    View source passageHide passage
    The effect of the use of descriptive language can depend on evaluative considerations. For philosophy of law, that dependence raises special problems. If you cannot tell whether to describe an object as a ‘vehicle’ for the purposes of the Act without evaluative reasoning, then the legal effect of the Road Traffic Act does not depend merely on physical facts (such as that there were wheels on the chicken coop) and social facts (such as that Parliament used the word ‘vehicle’ in the Act, or the co

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective