Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Applying this appearance-relative concept of causation to... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Kant's philosophy is inconsistent regarding the application of categories to things in themselves

    Applying this appearance-relative concept of causation to things in themselves, as affection requires, violates the very semantic conditions Kant himself specifies for legitimate category use.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Kant(as used in epistemology and metaphysics)
    Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an influential German philosopher who argued that our minds shape how we experience reality, and that we can only truly know things as they appear to us, not as they are in themselves.
    Legitimate(in epistemology)
    Accepted as valid or justified according to the standards and rules of a particular field or time period.
    Semantic conditions(as used in logic and philosophy of language)
    The specific rules or requirements that determine whether a sentence is true or false; the conditions that must be met for a statement to mean what it says.
    affection(the specific philosophical concept requiring application to things in themselves)
    In Kant's philosophy, the way that things in themselves impact or influence our senses and mind to create our experiences.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    appearance-relative(describing a type of causation limited to our perception)
    Something that depends on how things seem to us or appear to our minds, rather than how they actually are in themselves.
    category(Aristotelian usage as discussed in the passage)
    A predicate, per Aristotle's usage; the term 'predicate' can refer to realities, concepts, or linguistic terms.
    causation(Lewis's counterfactual theory of causation)
    Event C causes event E if and only if there exists a chain C, D1, …, Dn, E such that each member (except C) is counterfactually dependent on the preceding event; causation is the ancestral of counterfactual dependence
    things in themselves(Kant's critical system)
    Entities posited as existing independently of human representation, distinct from appearances

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Kant's philosophy is inconsistent regarding the application of categories to thi...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective