Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aquinas argued that even omnipotence cannot make contradictions true, since they have no intelligible content for divine power to act upon.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If omnipotence is truly unlimited, restricting it by logical laws makes divinity subject to logical necessity—a real limitation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Aquinas assumes logical structure is independent of God, but if God creates all reality, divine will could constitute what is logically possible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim that contradictions lack 'intelligible content' begs the question—an omniscient being might comprehend contradictions in ways we cannot.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Power requires an intelligible object or state of affairs to bring about; contradiction lacks coherent content to actualize.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Logical laws describe the structure of reality itself, not external constraints on omnipotence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Omnipotence means power over all possible states; impossible states fall outside the domain of possibility.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.