Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aquinas argues in Summa Theologiae I.14 that God's intellect and essence are identical, making divine knowledge coextensive with all being itself.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If God's knowledge is identical to God's essence, then God cannot know counterfactuals (unrealized possibilities) without them being real parts of God.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Identity of intellect and essence seems to conflate epistemology with ontology—knowing X does not require X to literally be part of the knower's being.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim makes God's knowledge of evil identical to God's essence, which contradicts the principle that God's essence is purely good and free of evil.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If God is absolutely simple (no composition of parts), then God's knowing faculty cannot differ from God's essence without introducing real distinction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If God is truly infinite and omniscient, divine knowledge must encompass all possible and actual beings without limitation or external dependence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Being itself is the ultimate ground of intelligibility; God's self-knowledge as infinite being naturally includes knowledge of all derivative beings.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.