Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Aquinas's grounding of redistribution in natural law comm... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Private property rights are valid but are subject to a duty to distribute one's surplus (superflua).

    Aquinas's grounding of redistribution in natural law commits him to a universal duty, yet the vocation-relative definition of surplus entrenches existing social hierarchies rather than correcting them, producing an internal inconsistency in the argument's egalitarian ambitions.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Aquinas
    Thomas Aquinas was a medieval Italian priest and philosopher (1225-1274) who became one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He attempted to show that Christian faith and human reason are compatible, arguing that we can use logic and observation to understand God and the natural world. His ideas deeply shaped Catholic theology and continue to influence how religious and secular institutions think about ethics, knowledge, and the relationship between science and belief.
    Egalitarian ambitions(what the passage suggests Aquinas's argument is trying (but failing) to achieve)
    A goal or intention to make things more equal for everyone. 'Egalitarian' means believing in equality, so this phrase describes aims that try to reduce unfairness or inequality.
    Internal inconsistency(The paradox shows that the concept of equipossibility contains a flaw)
    A contradiction or logical problem within a system itself—when a single theory or method produces conflicting answers to the same question.
    Social hierarchies(the existing power structures that the vocation-relative approach preserves)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Systems where some people are ranked as 'higher' or more important than others based on their job, wealth, birth, or status. Medieval feudalism is an example where kings were at the top and peasants at the bottom.
    Surplus(Philosophical surplus means unnecessary elements for answering philosophical questions)
    Extra stuff that goes beyond what you need; something left over that isn't essential to solving the main problem.
    Universal duty(ethics)
    An obligation that applies to all people in similar situations, without exception.
    Vocation-relative(how Aquinas defines what counts as surplus (extra wealth))
    Something that depends on your job, role, or social position. For example, a vocation-relative duty might mean 'if you're a doctor, you have a duty to help the sick,' but ordinary people don't have that exact same duty.
    grounding(Drawn from contemporary metaphysics; proposed as potentially applicable to understanding the foundations of legality.)
    A metaphysical relation in which some entities or facts are more foundational than others, providing a hierarchical structure of the world.
    natural law(Locke's Essays on the Law of Nature)
    A moral-legal framework that satisfies all the requisites of law: grounded in a superior will, rule-establishing, and binding on humans
    redistribution(The passage notes identifying whether redistribution has occurred is difficult because implementers' purposes are often opaque)
    A change in the distribution of holdings (e.g., income or wealth) across a population, whether or not intentionally brought about

    Connections

    2 topics

    Rights & Liberty1 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Private property rights are valid but are subject to a duty to distribute one's ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective