Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Aquinas's identification of God with Being Itself smuggle... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A God who was less than maximally perfect would be an idol.

    Aquinas's identification of God with Being Itself smuggles Parmenidean ontology into theology, making 'idol' a polemical label for legitimate alternative conceptions of the divine.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Parmenides's immutable Being framework fundamentally conflicts with biblical theism's emphasis on divine action, will, and responsive relationship.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Aquinas's equation of God with pure Being excludes divine attributes like freedom and personhood central to Jewish-Christian tradition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Process theology and personalist models offer coherent alternatives that don't require Being-identification yet avoid idolatry.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Aquinas explicitly distinguished esse from Parmenidean Being; his doctrine of analogy preserves divine transcendence without collapsing into monism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Identifying God with 'Being Itself' doesn't preclude personhood or action—it grounds them metaphysically rather than limiting them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Alternative divine concepts must also avoid both anthropomorphism and radical unknowability; Aquinas's framework systematically addresses this tension.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Aquinas
    Thomas Aquinas was a medieval Italian priest and philosopher (1225-1274) who became one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He attempted to show that Christian faith and human reason are compatible, arguing that we can use logic and observation to understand God and the natural world. His ideas deeply shaped Catholic theology and continue to influence how religious and secular institutions think about ethics, knowledge, and the relationship between science and belief.
    Being Itself(Aquinas's core theological claim)
    The idea that God is not just a thing that exists, but is existence or being in its purest form—the ultimate source of all existence.
    Idol (in philosophical context)(used as a polemical (argumentative) label in the statement)
    Here, a false or inadequate concept or image of God—something that misrepresents what God truly is.
    Ontology(Carnap argues this enterprise is based on a mistake)
    The philosophical discipline that tries to answer hard questions about what there really is.
    Parmenidean ontology(the philosophical tradition the statement says Aquinas draws from)
    A way of thinking about existence that comes from Parmenides, an ancient Greek philosopher, who argued that true reality is unchanging, eternal, and unified—influencing how later thinkers thought about what it means to truly 'be.'
    Polemical(describing a type of intellectual work)
    Argumentative or combative in nature; focused on attacking or defending against opposing views rather than developing new ideas.
    theology(Hobbes 1655, 1.8)
    The doctrine about the nature and attributes of the eternal, ungenerable, and incomprehensible God, in whom no composition and no division can be established and no generation can be understood

    Connections

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    A God who was less than maximally perfect would be an idol.Alternative divine concepts must also avoid both anthropomorphism and radical un...Aquinas explicitly distinguished esse from Parmenidean Being; his doctrine of an...Aquinas's equation of God with pure Being excludes divine attributes like freedo...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    Identifying God with 'Being Itself' doesn't preclude personhood or action—it gro...Parmenides's immutable Being framework fundamentally conflicts with biblical the...Process theology and personalist models offer coherent alternatives that don't r...