Aquinas's own framework distinguishes natural inclinations from supernatural ends, making the inferential bridge from universal desire to attainable good require additional theological premises not contained in bare theism.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Aquinas: Thomas Aquinas was a medieval Italian priest and philosopher (1225-1274) who became one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He attempted to show that Christian faith and human reason are compatible, arguing that we can use logic and observation to understand God and the natural world. His ideas deeply shaped Catholic theology and continue to influence how religious and secular institutions think about ethics, knowledge, and the relationship between science and belief.
Attainable good(as what universal desire supposedly points toward): Something genuinely good or valuable that a person can actually achieve or obtain in reality.
Bare theism(as the minimal belief framework that isn't enough for Aquinas's full argument): The simple belief that God exists, without any specific religious commitments or detailed theological doctrines attached to it.
Inferential bridge(as the logical gap being discussed): A logical connection that lets you jump from one idea to another—in this case, a reasoning chain that connects what people universally want to what's actually achievable.

Based on where you are in your exploration