Aquinas's own gift analogy depends on a divine ownership claim, but ownership-based prohibitions collapse if the supposed owner deliberately constituted agents with autonomous will.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Aquinas: Thomas Aquinas was a medieval Italian priest and philosopher (1225-1274) who became one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He attempted to show that Christian faith and human reason are compatible, arguing that we can use logic and observation to understand God and the natural world. His ideas deeply shaped Catholic theology and continue to influence how religious and secular institutions think about ethics, knowledge, and the relationship between science and belief.
Divine ownership claim(as the foundation of Aquinas's analogy): The idea that God owns or has ultimate control over everything he created, similar to how a person owns something they made or gave as a gift.
Prohibitions collapse(as what happens to God's authority in the philosophical argument): When a rule or ban breaks down and no longer makes sense or works—in this case, God's ability to forbid humans from doing things falls apart.
autonomous will(Kant's account of rational agency): A will that causes action by way of a universal law of which the rational agent itself is the origin or author, rather than a law authored by nature.
gift analogy(Used as a theistic argument against suicide): The theological argument that God bestows life upon humans as a gift, and that it would be ungrateful or wrong to reject that gift by taking one's own life.

1 topic