Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Aquinas (ST I, Q.12) argues that the intellect can know God through the lumen gloriae, achieving real cognitive participation in divine being.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Positing lumen gloriae as intermediate between knower and God potentially obscures rather than clarifies how direct knowledge occurs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If lumen gloriae mediates divine knowledge, it's unclear whether intellect knows God or merely the glorified light, creating regress problem.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Aquinas's doctrine of God as actus purus suggests God's intelligibility is self-presenting; additional cognitive apparatus seems superfluous.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Creatures need supernatural elevation to reach God's transcendent nature; lumen gloriae provides necessary ontological bridge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Direct beatific vision requires transformed cognitive capacities; lumen gloriae explains how finite intellect participates in infinite being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Thomas's analogy with natural light illuminating objects parallels how lumen gloriae actualizes intellect's latent capacity for divine knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.