Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Argument S achieves very little as a justification
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Argument S only supports inference X for those who already accept inductive inference
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An argument that only works for those already convinced of its core rule provides minimal justificatory value
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Browse more in Skepticism
Related propositions within the same area of thought.