Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aristotelian demonstrations do not constitute genuine knowledge
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Demonstration must be based on premises prior to and better known than the conclusion
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Primary premises are arbitrary inventions taken on faith to avoid infinite regress
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Demonstrations based on arbitrary invented premises cannot reflect perfect knowledge
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Browse more in Skepticism
Related propositions within the same area of thought.