Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aristotelian perfectionism already entails equal respect for rational agency as constitutive of human flourishing, without supplementary argument.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Aristotle's framework permits hierarchies of rational development; some humans possess fuller rationality than others, undercutting equal respect claims.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Perfectionism values excellence disparately across individuals based on natural talents; this hierarchical ranking conflicts with equal respect for all rational agents.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim requires showing that respecting rational *agency itself* follows from valuing rational *excellence*, but these may demand different moral treatments.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Aristotle defines human flourishing (eudaimonia) as activity of the soul in accordance with reason, making rationality constitutive of human excellence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If rationality is what distinguishes humans and constitutes our highest good, respecting others' rational agency is required by the perfectionist framework itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Aristotelian virtue ethics grounds equal moral standing in shared human nature and rational capacity, not in separate egalitarian premises.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.