Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aristotle argues in the Nicomachean Ethics that external goods like health and resources are necessary conditions for eudaimonia, not merely instrumental aids.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Aristotle's claim that virtue is 'sufficient for eudaimonia' (NE VII.13) contradicts strict necessity of external goods.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If external goods were necessary conditions, virtuous enslaved people or the destitute could never achieve eudaimonia.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Aristotle distinguishes between complete eudaimonia and virtue itself; external goods may enhance but not constitute it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Aristotle explicitly states in NE I.8-9 that external goods are needed for virtuous activity, not just nice-to-haves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Without health, resources, or social position, individuals cannot perform virtuous acts that constitute eudaimonia.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Eudaimonia requires actualizing human potential through activity, which materially depends on external enablers.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42