Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Aristotle distinguished episteme from phronesis, holding ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The claim that intellectual activities are intrinsically good explains why some instances of knowledge are more important than others.

    Aristotle distinguished episteme from phronesis, holding that practical wisdom about particulars is irreducibly valuable and not subordinate to general principles.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Moral situations often contain contextual nuances that universal rules cannot capture without losing practical applicability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Experienced practitioners make sound decisions through cultivated judgment that exceeds what abstract principles alone can deliver.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Phronesis involves perception of particulars as morally salient in ways that precede and enable application of general knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Practical wisdom still presupposes general principles about human flourishing; it cannot operate entirely independently of them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If phronesis were truly irreducible to principles, we could not rationally teach, criticize, or justify particular decisions to others.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Aristotle himself grounds phronesis in universal virtues, suggesting particulars serve universal ends rather than standing alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedVirtue Ethics1 linked

    Related

    Aristotle himself grounds phronesis in universal virtues, suggesting particulars...Experienced practitioners make sound decisions through cultivated judgment that ...If phronesis were truly irreducible to principles, we could not rationally teach...Moral situations often contain contextual nuances that universal rules cannot ca...
    +3 moreShow less
    Phronesis involves perception of particulars as morally salient in ways that pre...Practical wisdom still presupposes general principles about human flourishing; i...The claim that intellectual activities are intrinsically good explains why some ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit