Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aristotle holds that eudaimonia requires the stable, consistent exercise of virtuous activity, not novel variation in pleasant pursuits.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Aristotle values phronesis (practical wisdom) which adapts virtuous action to novel circumstances; rigid repetition contradicts this flexibility.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Eudaimonia includes contemplation (theoria) and friendship, which involve spontaneous, context-dependent engagement, not mechanical consistency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates stable disposition with monotonous repetition; virtuous exercise can vary in form while maintaining the same excellence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Virtue is a stable hexis (disposition) developed through habituation, requiring consistent practice to maintain and express excellently.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Eudaimonia is the highest human good and complete in itself; fleeting pleasures are instrumental and inferior to sustained virtuous activity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Character excellence requires reliable patterns of right action; novel pursuits indicate inconsistency incompatible with genuine virtue.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.